Managers need reports. Lots of it!
Enterprise solutions have dedicated module(s) which satisfy this need for reports. These implementations require a SIGNIFICANT cost to satisfy individual reporting needs. It will consume significant processing power to generate, and managers who want these reports will spend significant time going through the information (at least at the start).
BUT do we really need these reports?
Monitoring and Control, a key management function, requires you (the manager) to measure and act on key parameters of the business. You will need to know whether these parameters are within range, improving or deteriorating.
Reports should have this information!
BUT do they?
Unless sufficient and focused effort is spent in defining,
- What parameters to measure?
- Why should they be measured?
- How can they be measured?
- How often should they be measured?
most reports will have lot of data, but not what you can use for monitoring and controlling the business function.
WHY NOT the initial effort?
When report definitions are done, each manager tries to grab a piece of the information pie and mark their territory in the solution.
In the resulting struggle, they might not have sufficient time for a structured approach to define the above.
What a manager needs for his/her business unit may not be what the organization as a whole requires.
This is where the business owner/sponsor should take control of report definition and even go to the extent of defining the ‘One Metric That Matters’ and derive the reporting requirements around it.
It will consume more management effort and time initially, but will help to reduce report implementation costs, which will make the CFO happier, and reduce processing power, which will make the system admin happier.
Most importantly, these efforts will make sure managers get reports with the information needed for monitoring and controlling the business function.
The acid test is when the CEO asks for information about a key metric…. None of the managers should go around asking IT; “Where is my report?”
Senior Vice President – Software Development
From insights to thought-leadershipView More
Ensure Successful M3/CloudSuite Go-Live with a Robust Testing Strategy
Whether it’s a multi-site rollout or a minor fix, testing your ERP ensures that it works as expected. An error-free ERP implementation adds to the user experiences across the supply chain, and helps increase stakeholder productivity. A buggy, slow ERP can hinder operational efficiency. A carefully-planned ERP testing strategy ensures that the ERP performs optimally from the go-live itself, without hatching unprecedented errors, which not only require costly rework but also affect the smooth functioning of the organization’s operations.
Make your work meaningful with the power of Infor OS and Infor Document Management (IDM)
Infor OS is a cloud operating platform that seamlessly connects services to provide a robust integration framework. The scalable technologies on top of which Infor OS is built are capable of bringing together disparate technologies and solutions, whether it’s an application developed by Infor, by a third-party or in-house by your organization.
Moving to the Multi-Tenant Cloud: Busting the Top 3 Myths
We’re about to bust some serious myths about Infor’s multi-tenant cloud in this blog post—so brace yourself! Let’s start by demystifying the real difference between single-tenant and multi-tenant. Single-tenant is a single instance of the software and supporting infrastructure to serve a single customer, while multi-tenant means that a single instance of the software and its supporting infrastructure serves multiple customers.
#1724 – The Booth you need to visit at Inforum 2019!
Inforum 2019 has a lot to offer with rich content being discussed at speed sessions and guest talks, along with some of the industry’s best entertainers. With a week left to go - this Inforum, we’re giving you a few good reasons as to why you need to visit Booth #1724.